Against Miscegenation:
On the Evils of Race-Mixing and the Existential Threat It Poses to European Posterity
There are many evils emblematic of American society. In the wake of almost a century of American hegemony, such evils necessarily extend to the constellation of satellite, puppet states under the heel of the American Empire. Facilitated by America’s status as a lone super power, waning though that position may be, American Unkultur produces and exports these evils to Europe most particularly and the world generally. Rampant promiscuity, coupled with successive waves of feminism, which in turn has led to the ubiquity of rampant divorce and single motherhood, are two of the most prominent. The birth of the pornography menace in the 70s and 80s, which then exploded with the advent of unregulated Internet, is another: a vice this legal system and this form of government has proven utterly incapable of addressing in any meaningful way. Degenerate music that is just as offensive for its lack of musical or artistic value as much as its subversive messagimg abounds, most particularly rap “music,” but also various manifestations of gyno-centric pop music, from Madonna, to Katy Perry, from the Spice Girls to Cardi B, to name just a small few among legion. These are the portents of an utter shit culture, best described not as culture at all, but Unkultur, replete with junk fast-food as well as generations of mindless, mind-rotting mass entertainment, from the sitcoms of both yesteryear and today and idiotic gameshows, to most all fare offered from streaming services like Hulu and Netflix, to the ultimate poison to any attention span beyond that of a humming bird: TikTok. Some, although not nearly enough, perceive these evils for what they are. These among many other societal harms, including illicit drug use which, if not yet condoned outright, is tolerated more and more, with full legalization on the horizon. There is one evil in particular, however, that is the focus of this essay, the nature of which perhaps defies precise, succinct articulation as to the nature of the harms and threats it poses to European peoples and their posterity. That evil is the specter of miscegenation, of race-mixing
A still from the 1944 epic Henry V, an image featured in an interesting montage in 28 Years Later drawing on various of images of the English at war, from the long bowmen at Agincourt to her misguided and tragic role in the brothers’ wars that were both world wars. A highlight of a very uneven, flawed, imperfect film, and a subject that should have been discussed at greater length in this review.
A Brief Primer on Race, Culture, and Identity, Indelibly and Inseparably Intertwined
There are several considerations which implore intolerance of this scourge of the modern world, shaped and defined by American hegemony. First and foremost is how race is a defining feature of a people and its civilization. This immutable axiom is revealed whenever one considers the great peoples and civilizations of the world and how those civilizations—those peoples—are defined by their racial phenotypes. The Face of Britain has long been a touchstone of British art and culture throughout British political and cultural history; as such, that face, a small selection of Anglo-Saxon, Celtic and Norse phenotypes, stands as the very avatar of what it means to be British and part of the Anglosphere. Consider the pale visage of the King’s Guard (formerly Queen’s Guard) stationed at various royal residences from London Tower and Buckingham Castle to Windsor Castle. Or consider any worthy depiction of King Henry V, from Lawrence Olivier to Kenneth Branagh in the excellent 1989 production. One might argue that even pop and alternative music from British artists in the 80s and 90s serve a similar role, although this assertion is fraught with peril given how the period was often characterized by androgyny and the beginnings of multiracialism.1
This same principle applies to Germany and the German People as well as other nations and peoples of Europe. As explicated in “The Inherent Right of Race, Blood, and Soil” various Germanic phenotypes are inextricably bound to both German culture and identity:
One discerns this self-evident truth by simply beholding a lovely, buxom, blonde Brunhilde-type beer maid at a Volksfest or Gastwirtschaft, or for that matter the German phenotypes of German soldiers and officers (or the female auxiliaries or other women of the Third Reich) in war time footage as well as Hollywood movies or of World War II documentaries of equally dubious veracity.[9] Other examples that are far less sensitive to the neuroses of the modern German consciousness range from the Opera of Richard Wagner to German art from Albrecht Dürer to Lucas Cranach the Elder and beyond, to any decent, faithful production of Goethe’s Faust. The same applies to the character Werther himself, an overly dramatic blonde poet destroyed by his obsessive longing for Charlotte.
The essay even notes how “the paintings of Caspar David Friedrich [are] bound up in race,” a relevant consideration given the meteoric rise in popularity the once neglected artist has enjoyed over the past couple of decades, and nowhere more than in modern Germany, despite all her tribulations as she falters on the precipice of racial and national suicide. As explicated further in “The Inherent Right of Race, Blood, and Soil:”
Even without seeing the facial features of the Germanic individuals in his paintings depicting the Rückenfigur, the elements of race and blood are indelibly intertwined in his works, particularly as the most prominent figure of German Romantic painting. Indeed, as German Romanticism writ large was inextricably linked with German nationalism and the desire for national liberation and German reunification, the element of the German phenotype as part and parcel of this expression of German culture and identity is undeniable.
As blatantly obvious as this proposition is, it eludes far too many in a society characterized by what is best described as ethno-masochism among a critical mass of white European peoples. Going well beyond bias, malice and outright contempt increasingly pervade common attitudes about the British in particular and all European peoples generally, even among British and other European peoples themselves. As Joe Rogan explained during a recent appearance of MartyrMade, the masses, so indoctrinated by propaganda of the age, reflexively wince at the very notion that white European countries should be as they have been for centuries. Such irrational objections are easily overcome when one simply considers, as just one example, how Japanese culture and society is indelibly linked with the Japanese racial phenotype. The kimono, a traditional Japanese garment, is inseparable from the Japanese phenotype, just as the Japanese phenotype cannot be separated from other auspices of Japanese culture and civilization, from the samurai warrior to the sumo wrestler. Japan would no longer be Japanese if it were not populated almost exclusively by Japanese people, just as Germany cannot be German if not populated by actual Germans in a true racial, völkisch sense. The very notion of what it means to be Japanese is indelibly bound up with Japanese racial properties and features. And just as any round eye is an immediate imposter in traditional Japanese garb, the same principle applies to Britain, Germany, all the peoples and nations of Europe; a Kenyan or East Indian is no less an eternal imposter in a Scottish kilt and regimental dress as he is in Bavarian Lederhosen, Janker, und Tracht.
Precisely because race is a defining element and feature of any great civilization and culture, it is also a signifier of that culture—a symbol synonymous with and inseparable from that culture. The individual sees himself in that divine, indispensable signifier, and identifies and communes with others belonging to his race, people, and culture, as the collective is in turn formed and bolstered by that common, shared identity.
Community and identity through race is further augmented through a fundamental principle about the nature of posterity. Just as our ancestors live through us, we live through our posterity, provided our posterity look as we do, belong to the same people that our ancestors did. This concept, only crudely described with the word “people,” is best signified by the German word Volk, which carries a distinct racial connotation lost in translation. Those not of a religious persuasion, from atheists and agnostics, to adeistic and atheistic pagans who embrace Odinism for its philosophy of religion and as an expression of Norse and Germanic ancestral heritage in contravention to some of the pathologies of Christianity and its universalism, have a unique understanding of how securing and advancing the future of our posterity is a key strategy to defeat death in the unlikelihood of any afterlife promised by more conventional religions.
Issues of Race and Race-Mixing in Modern Mass Media.
These and other phenomena about race, culture, and identity explain why Hollywood and various hostile institutions of culture and power are so persistent in “race-swapping.” They seek to negate or at the very least obfuscate what it means to be British, or German, or even European. These insidious efforts take many forms. One example includes the cinematic travesty Cruella2, which depicted English rose Anita Radcliffe not as a lovely strawberry blonde, but as an African woman with an aggressive afro, a black-as-tar darkie, indeed; notably, the film supplanted Anita’s utterly English surname with the goofy moniker “Darling.”
A juxtaposition of Helene Stanley, the real life actress that inspired this and other female characters in classic Disney animations, and an animated depiction of Anita Radcliffe, exemplifying the English phenotype.
No “darling” of ours. On the left, Anita race-swapped as Anita Darling. On the right, another depiction of the true Anita, Anita Radcliffe. The powers that be are all too brazen in their insidious bid to replace the Face of Britain particularly and the Faces of Europe more generally.
The Great Replacement that is taking place also facilitates these efforts, as the national soccer teams of European countries are becoming less and less European. This is particularly disconcerting with Germany, a country and society where displaying the German flag is looked askance at, with international soccer (or football, if one prefers) being one important exception. When the national team was still largely if not exclusively racially and ethnically German, as the term is properly understood, some naïvely hoped the (anticipated) successes of the German national team might act as a conduit to restoke nationalist flames. As the team becomes increasingly less German, and as players seem more preoccupied with leftist virtue signaling than actually winning, the German national team and its successes and more particularly embarrassing failures are rendered unsuitable as a catalyst for reigniting nationalist fervor and a national awakening
A notable graphic from Germany’s glorious obliteration of the perennially obnoxious and arrogant Brazil squad. with the infamous final score of 7-1. The Mineiraço was not that long ago, although it did occur just before Angela Merkel, the bane of Germany and Europe, did the unthinkable. Note the red, white, and black of the away kit and its resemblance to the Reichskriegsflagge, a matter of some controversy at the time. The author owns this very garment. Germany finally won the world cup after a number of disappointing failures, and yet the Wiedererwachung has not yet come to flourish.
Abstoßend und abscheulich. The German national team about a decade later, protesting the World Cup’s prohibition against demonstrations pushing LGBTQ-Yuck, in order to conform to the host nation’s Islamic moral system. Of particular note is how many fewer members of die Nationalmannschaft are actually German. In a recent Euro Cup tournament, Hungarian fans taunted with the chant “Deutschland, Deutschland, homosexuell.” An irrefutable indictment and one that makes it impossible to support this team.
The concerted push for race-mixing and mongrelization is so overt, so on the nose that a brief survey of these most disconcerting trends can only bolster credibility of sharp commentary, found on more cavalier venues on the Internet, hypothesizing the push for miscegenation is done intentionally for nefarious purposes, in concert with the bid to render whites a minority everywhere, both in Europe and the Anglosphere in the New World, namely the United States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. Such evil intentions have been stated explicitly, such as when Anthony Bordain stated that the only way to overcome the supposed racism plaguing society is for future generalizations to be completely and irretrievably miscegenated. But such intentions are also inferred from the actions themselves, as a basic principle of criminal law is to establish the Mens Rea (intent) requirement by discerning that actions demonstrate intent for the results and consequences that naturally and predictably arise from such actions.
Mongrelized, miscegenated offspring cannot relate or be rallied by racially defined avatars or symbols of culture or civilization, just as they cannot belong to that people or civilization. A Briton—an actual Briton of exclusively European descent—can contemplate images or stories of King Henry V or Richard the Lionheart, see himself and his posterity in these images and stories, and discern thereby the evils of the modern world, of “globohomo” as it is known in Internet parlance. A miscegenated mongrel most emphatically cannot.
The war guilt complex that has been installed in the German consciousness throughout the post-war era renders precious few Germans likely to relate with the heroic Landser or Panzer commander or allow such figures to resonate with them. Other cultural expressions that are distinctly and unmistakably German have also been tainted by the National Socialist period, most particularly the work of Richard Wagner. Notwithstanding that, Germans may nonetheless discern how race is inextricably linked and intertwined with German culture and identity in other, less controversial expressions. As explicated earlier, this, quite notably, includes the paintings of Caspar David Friedrich and other figures in the German Romantic movement, of which nationalism was a defining feature. There are myriad others.
Conversely, a cadre of international elites who want to dismantle racial and national identity while also seeking to sabotage any chance for ethno-nationalism to achieve prominence also have a vested interest in cultivating a nondescript polyglot of disjointed, unrelated peoples from different parts of the world, as the rise of such a morass of genetic mishmash of varied hues of brown makes it increasingly less likely for the populist, ethno-nationalist right to ever seize power, particularly in a democracy (unless of course democracy is overthrown). In America, such a polyglot, mongrelized people with some contingent of European descent but large components of black, mestizo, Asian, and even East Indian ancestry would have no fidelity to or interest in preserving the European peoples which give those of European descent meaning and purpose through cultural and racial identity. Destroying the peoples of the world through race mixing might destroy real diversity, but it would, in turn, create stability for the ruling class who simply desire fidelity to modernity and all its unspeakable ugliness, with no other purpose than to consume and be good little serfs in the terrible new order that is to come. Obviously, these efforts do not seem directed at destroying all the peoples of the world, but only Europeans, as well as Japanese and Koreans to some lesser extent.
These critical precepts are fundamental to understanding the evils of miscegenation, and why it must not be tolerated, or at the very least not be celebrated and encouraged as it has been in the modern world for far too long. And just as these and other considerations reveal miscegenation as a great evil and existential threat to our civilization and posterity, they in turn evoke preservation—racial preservation—as an overriding moral imperative. The moral imperative of preserving biodiversity, indeed every conceivable subspecies of any animal is apparent. But as we rightly conclude that a particular fish, bird, or even particular breed of dog (pit bulls likely excepted) must be preserved, why should the various faces and phenotypes of Europe not be infinitely more worthy of preservation?3
While Hollywood and modern entertainment has been, overall, a monstrously destructive force in culture and society, one positive attribute of mass media is how it has demonstrated the striking beauty of certain phenotypes that are emphatically and unmistakably European. Kirsten Dunst is approaching fifty, but was a timeless beauty in her day. She exemplifies blonde, Nordic features bar none, and even stated as much in an interview, boasting that she is essentially “Aryan,” a “Swedish milkmaid.” Gillian Anderson is another exemplar of the beauty and sexual allure of white womanhood, the pre-Raphaelite sex goddess of the modern age and, arguably, for all time. Catherine Bach, who was only ever known for role as Daisy Duke and more particularly Sophia Loren are exemplars of the brunette variant of the beauty and sexual allure wielded by white, European womanhood. Lamentably, Diane (Heid)kruger is another example—her real surname is Heidkrüger, changed to Kruger without the umlaut to appeal to Anglo and International audiences that disfavor all but the most common Germanic surnames. Cast in 2004 as Helen of Troy herself, this blonde beauty is of particular note given her collaboration in one of the more egregious instances of defamation on her nation’s history and character perpetrated by Hollywood: Inglorius Basterds. Her role as Bridget von Hammersmark, a German actress who commits treason by collaborating with the Allies, has far too many parallels to the actress in real life. Even as the film and her collaboration in that production seek to abnegate and deconstruct the Germanic ideal she exemplifies, she nonetheless personifies that ideal, just as her beauty and sexual allure are a draw to audiences.
Most recently Sydney Sweeney4 has become a subject of controversy for how she exemplifies this very phenomenon. This controversy stems from an American Eagle advertising campaign, in which she states she has good genes, which then is replaced by the word “jeans.” Leftists have been outraged by a perceived allusion to eugenics and Nazi era propaganda. Consider however that such allusions would be well-grounded in facts and reason, as well as something profoundly instinctual, primal even. No matter the cost, no matter the bloodshed, people, both men and women, with these features must continue to populate the sacred continent of Europe until the end of time. In relation to male figures complementing their female counterparts, Christian Bale comes to this author’s mind first and foremost, as does Rutger Hauer, made immortal in his role as Roy Batty in Blade Runner. Chris Hemsworth came to prominence long after Hollywood became creatively bankrupt, and has not been featured in some of the great films featuring Bale, who is also an underrated actor, but Hemsworth’s phenotype nonetheless illustrates this essential principle, even if all or most of his films hardly qualify as cinema at all, as the term is properly understood.
This is not to suggest that every white woman looks like Margot Robbie and that every white man is as handsome as Christian Bale, or even that most do. But just as it has been stated that every Englishman has, to some varying degree, the tongue of Shakespeare, a hallmark of European phenotypes are exemplified by the most attractive white men and women who ever lived: the sons and daughters of Mother Europa as both Freyja and Venus incarnate. Such representations also exist in less vulgar cultural expressions, including fine classical art and literature. The image of English beauties depicted in the paintings of the pre-Raphaelite school come to mind first and foremost, but there are many other examples throughout the body of classical art and literature alike.
Just as resolution against miscegenation is necessary to ensure the planet—Europe and the Anglosphere in the New World in particular—continue to be populated by European peoples with these phenotypes, the inverse is also true, namely that miscegenation will, if left unabated, eradicate such peoples and their very phenotypes, replacing it with an ugly, non-descript brown polyglot. This is particularly egregious in relation to the white and black variety of mongrelization. While there are always exceptions and outliers, most specimens of such spawn are, much more often than not, an abomination. It is of course true those of mixed-race ancestry are often if not invariably alienated from both groups.5 As explained earlier, they are people with no identity, have no fidelity to what they are the very abnegation of. This makes such people rootless, more pliable, ideal for dystopic modernity that offers little more than naked consumerism, but it also afflicts a toll of alienation and estrangement on those individuals.
Much propaganda in mass media will present the likes of Mariah Carey as the avatar for those born from black and white miscegenation. This author submits this meme is far more typical of such loathsome breeding.
Grappling With a More Nebulous Evil: What If Everybody Does That?
“No snowflake in an avalanche ever feels responsible”
- Widely but falsely attributed to Voltaire
As with some other existential threats facing Europe and the West in the modern world, one facet of race-mixing that makes it different than other evils is how innocuous it may seem in the individual instance, or at least some individual instances. An example illustrating this, that comes to my mind at least, is Yasser Seirawan, a chess prodigy and grand master. Aside from being a brilliant mind who reached the apex of his calling, he is, by all accounts, a decent and kind human being. Yasser Seirawan is half Syrian and half British, his father a Syrian man and his mother British. Born in 1960, he was conceived when race mixing was not something promoted in the “culture,” and still carried some stigma, although not enough to dissuade his mother, an English woman from Nottingham whose maiden name was Margaret Elvin, from having children with a man from Syria.
In considering Yasser Seirawan as a case study, there are other important caveats. One, he was not raised in Britain, but quite famously in Seattle, although his family moved there from Virginia where he spent most of his childhood before taking up chess at a café called The Last Exit Before Brooklyn. Beyond that, there was not then, nor does there appear to be now, a fetishization of English women copulating with and even marrying Middle Eastern men. This is a fundamental distinction from the problem of race mixing as it exists as a phenomenon now. It is not only tolerated, but celebrated, advertised even throughout both mass media and social media. In this way, his parents were a singular anomaly, not a cultural and sociological phenomenon. Compare and contrast with how modern media, that is both social media and mass media, both now and before the advent and ubiquity of the Internet and smartphones, push race mixing in media and advertising, including a fusillade of advertisements depicting interracial couples, most particularly white women and black men. As discussed at further length below, the ubiquity of interracial relationships in advertising is joined with similar efforts in film and television, both broadcast and streaming services alike.
These considerations reveal miscegenation to be a different sort of evil than something like murder which is wrong in the singular instance as well as the collective.6 An imperfect analogy that should nonetheless suffice for illustrative purposes is pouring foreign substances in a lake. Pouring a bottle of Coca-Cola or other soft drink, by itself, in that limited, isolated instance, will not really harm the water purity of the lake or other body of water. But if lots of people start pouring Coke, or even more nefarious substances in the lake, so that it happens on a large enough scale, then the body of the lake is endangered. Once such activity has reached a critical mass, each individual instance then needs to be strongly sanctioned in a way that was not necessary when it was an isolated, seemingly innocuous instance. Stated more precisely, just as water and air quality require a baseline equilibrium, so it is with racial demographics. In this way, there is a fundamental distinction to be discerned: two people of different racial backgrounds who, without any cultural influence, indoctrination, or programming, happen to meet, fall in love and marry, and constitute nothing more than a most unusual anomaly, one in tens or even hundreds of thousands, is fundamentally different than a recurring trend that is a reflection of fetishization and propagation of race-mixing in mass media.
A Sociological and Cultural Phenomenon and the Role of Mass Media
This consideration in turn illustrates how miscegenation is often not an individual choice at all, but is a cultural and sociological phenomenon. This cultural and sociological phenomenon is not only augmented but made possible by a concerted propaganda campaign through mass media as well as social media. Consider the AMC zombie series The Walking Dead (which was incidentally panned by George A Romero, director of The Night of the Living Dead and its successor films and godfather of the zombie horror genre). The series eventually came to a point where all romantic love interests were interracial. This is typical of mass media as it is increasingly characterized by a deliberate effort to represent interracial couples, sex, and romance, often in ways that are out of place, as the frequency and pervasiveness of such representations far outweigh the occurrence of such unions in real life. The first season of The Last of Us7 included a flashback episode revealing when and how the protagonist, Ellie Williams, was initially exposed to the Cordyceps virus, and thus revealed to have a natural immunity that could save humanity; she was exposed during an interracial lesbian teen romance that culminates as the two explore an abandoned mall that still has electrical power, set to a cover of The Cure’ Just Like Heaven as a children’s lullaby, played with harp, glockenspiel, and the like; by the end of the episode, a dormant infected attacks them, killing her mystery meat, brown “love,” while also biting her, which she, having rare immunity, survives.
Perhaps the worst offender to this author’s limited knowledge of popular “culture” is the Netflix series Bridgerton8, which imagines the regency period of Britain as “multicultural” and multiracial. This allows the sordid band of harridans, harpies, and viragos that doubtlessly comprise most of the audience to delude themselves into thinking they are cultured and intellectual by indulging in such a cheap knock-off of Sense and Sensibility—on television, not the printed word, as the latter is not suited for either their very limited intellect or stunted attention span. While they indulge such silly and preposterous pretensions, derived from stilted mimicry of classic literature in the genre of streaming media conducive to binge watching, the principal allure of this dreck is that it allows them to do so without feeling guilty about how utterly and emphatically British—in its proper, ethnic and racial sense—such cultural expressions like actual classic literature really are.
There is a wonderful and timely poem about when the Anglo-Saxon finally began to hate. And yet provocations and outrages like these have not yet activated this most necessary response.
The indoctrination and programming run deep, as interracial relationships have become ubiquitous, and yet still jarringly conspicuous, through ever larger swathes of advertising in particular. Some time ago Cheerios cereal ran an advertisement with a mixed breed child, along with her white mother and black father. Oreo cookies pushed lesbianism as well as miscegenation by depicting a mongrel woman from a white father and black woman, presenting the viewer with a full house of the “diversity stack.” The only thing missing would be so-called transgender representation. A long since defunct blog “Goodbye, America, in a Photo” offers an excellent record of many of the most ugly and vile portents of the modern world, including, in particular, how interracial relationships are promoted and encouraged in mass media, most particularly through advertising.
The significance of this trend cannot be overstated. The intent and motive behind these advertising campaigns is best understood not as selling a product with interracial sex, but using the goodwill, brand name recognition and status to sell race mixing, miscegenation, and so-called diversity to the populace. This of course may change as interracial sex and race swapping become more and more normalized and mainstream, which is the prime directive of these campaigns. These advertisements do normalize it, and break down collective resistance to it. It is yet another instance of defining deviancy down.9 And, as has been articulated before, as deviancy is defined ever further downward, what was formerly mainstream and acceptable soon becomes deviant, in this instance opposition to or even hesitance about miscegenation.
The programming takes other forms as well, including the deliberate and conspicuous pairing of black men with white women in various other media. The morning talk show with Kelly Ripa and Michael Strahan was one example. As recounted in “The Psychic Toll,” Amy Robach was paired with TJ Holmes as cohosts of Good Morning, America. This not only normalized the idea of white women being with black men, but converted to an actual cuckolding, as the former Miss Georgia beauty contestant—and finalist—left her husband to philander with the darkie. Other instances abound, including a modern resuscitation of the insipid, mindless gameshow “Let’s Make a Deal,” in which Tiffany Coyne shares cohosting duties with Wayne Brady, who is black, and Jonathan Magnum, who is white. A brief perusal of the various sports talk productions on ESPN as well as the NFL Network routinely present a statuesque, highly desirable blonde woman with a black man, or even several black men.
Above, TJ Holmes and Amy Robach as cohosts of Good Morning America. Such pairings subtly normalize the idea of inter-racial pairings. This instance led to actual cuckolding, as Robach cheated on her husband, before leaving him altogether. Below, an alluring picture of her at about 50. Alas, even in middle age, Amy Robach is a very attractive woman, and that matters not just in terms of how she is not partnered with a suitable, white husband or lover, but because, particularly as a celebrity newscaster, other women take cues from women who are—correctly—perceived as both highly desirable and having high status. Same principle applies to Heidi Klum, Elin Nordegren, Lindsey Vonn….
As has been expounded on at length in various essays on this publication10, such cultural programming, indeed such indoctrination, defines and predetermines what is naïvely conceived as “individual choice.” As a result, a certain sort of white woman with more than a predilection for race mixing has arisen in the form of various archetypes that are, sadly, readily observable in this sick society. Such instances are hardly individual choices at all, but observable sociological phenomena that can sadly be observed at a macro, societal level. Private correspondence has informed this author that white women are describing themselves as “snow bunnies,” either in their profiles on sex and dating applications, or as handles on various social media platforms, from TikTok to snapchat, and everything in between. This author also regrets to inform readers that “Queen of Spades”11 is also a cultural and sociological phenomenon, replete with a logo featured on garments as well as tattoos. In this sordid context, a “queen of spades” is a woman who has sex exclusively with other black men, often as group sex or rapid exchange of sexual partners. It also seems to pertain to a “hot wife” cuckolding fetish, in which a white husband or boyfriend watches his wife (or girlfriend) have sex with other black men. Somewhat humorously, right-winger Devon Stack included images of the Queen of Spades logo in a video presentation denouncing QAnon,12 the faction of delusional Trump supporters who believed there was a conspiracy that allowed Biden to win so as to create an opportunity for some sort of coup or takeover of the government, and that allowing Biden to steal the election was all part of some grand plan.
These and other examples are the bitter harvest that inevitably result from the advertising, mass media, and social media that normalize and indeed promote miscegenation. And just as these campaigns create such phenomena, the increasing prevalence of such behavior and these elements in the “culture” dull our resistance to these outrages the longer these circumstances are allowed to continue. A steady barrage of anything, no matter how shocking or reprobate it may be intrinsically, desensitizes the audience, and forces the audience to necessarily acclimate themselves to it over time. Furthermore, as argued in both “Culture and the Sexual Marketplace” and “On the Indoctrination of Frau Löwenherz,” what is perceived as individual choice is derived not from individual imagination or initiative but programming and indoctrination installed in the minds of the masses by cultural centers of power and mass media conglomerates. Understanding and embracing this fundamental principle is the hidden key that reveals the true nature of so many of the existential threats facing Europe.
These insidious sociological and cultural phenomena—driven by cultural institutions and those powerful, nefarious interests that wield them at present—is demonstrated both in fiction and real life, as life imitates art and vice versa. In the movie Thirteen, a white adolescent girl, Tracy, played by Evan Rachel Wood in her debut role at 15, deliberately seeks out black males to copulate with, all while engaging in all sorts of criminal activity from shoplifting, to stealing, to drug use. After sucking off some thuggish blackie, Tracy tries to place some veneer of feigned virtue on her degeneracy by stating to her friend after the fact that “if everybody married someone from a different race, then in one generation there would be no prejudice.”
Compare and contrast with the documentary The Lost Children of Rockdale County, which concerns the outbreak of syphilis in Rockdale County among teens and preteens as young as twelve, which was linked to hyper promiscuity not just with white male peers, but a conspicuous contingent of young black males as well. As Claire Sterk expounded in the documentary—not, it must be stressed, with anything close to an admonitory tone—there was an overt interracial aspect to the sexual profligacy leading to the outbreak of sexually transmitted diseases. The ugly hag described it thusly, even using the word “challenging,” a word with distinctly positive connotations:
There is a taboo that has not disappeared regarding sexual activity between African-American men and white women. Here we're talking about white adolescents. So in many ways, what was happening here was that the girls not only were challenging community norms by being sexually active, but were challenging those even further by engaging, at least part of the time, in sexual activity with African-American males.
Alas, the strong contingent of various sorts of white women involved in the George Floyd protests and riots, replete with Black Lives Matter banners and slogans, necessarily entails a more disconcerting conclusion that these disturbing trends have only exacerbated with the passage of time.
Race-Mixing and Women
Readers will doubtlessly note a focus on miscegenation as it pertains to women. This is not without good reason, as race mixing carries far weightier implications for woman than men, as men and women are, in fact, different, for so many reasons, stemming from the hard, immutable truth that humans are a sexually dimorphic species. Granting or denying sexual congress with women matters the most because of the cost and value that sexual access with women carries. This is quantified by the number of sperm a man produces during child rearing years versus the number of eggs a woman will produce during her child-rearing years. Whereas Genghis Khan is believed to have sired many thousands of offspring, a woman’s potential for child rearing is far more limited, and thus infinitely more valuable, both from an evolutionary psychology and practical perspective. It is further quantified by the cost associated with pregnancy, from the time and resources it requires, as well as how, until the advent of modern medicine, pregnancy entailed the risk of death. This consideration concerning the premium that access to females sexually necessarily commands explains, to a large degree, why much of the race-mixing has been targeted at women; every woman who has been so indoctrinated and acts on such indoctrination is one less woman available to rear white, European offspring, and thus contributes, in an immediate way, to white dispossession and white replacement. This is compounded sharply by how limited the capacity for procreation women are.
This in turn reveals that the long-term viability of a people and civilization can be assessed by how men respond to outsiders usurping their women. Island peoples and other primitives that allowed European colonial powers to have a free hand with their women were generally vanquished and subjugated quite quickly. Compare and contrast with how Toyotomi Hideyoshi responded to the threat of the European powers in the wake of the San Felipe incident.13 Japan expelled all European missionaries and forbade any foreign interlopers from entering Japan. Japan was the only civilization to withstand European colonization, and to this day Japan has demonstrated remarkable resilience against many of the trends destroying Europe through the Great Replacement and cultural and racial deracination and dispossession. In this way, Toyotomi Hideyoshi’s brutal vision likely reveals the one and only path of salvation for Mother Europa.
Toyotomi Hideyoshi. After unifying Japan, he saved his nation and his people from European colonialism by forcibly ousting all foreign imposters.
The profound differences between the sexes are relevant in other ways as well, most particularly how women, collectively, are influenced and even programmed by dominant narratives in culture and society, and how that in turn profoundly affects male behavior as they compete in the sexual marketplace. One of the axioms of human nature is that women police conformity, and yield to whatever the prevailing consensus is. In history this was seen when French women were proven all too willing with German conscripts and officers alike during German occupation, just as German women yielded themselves to their American conquerors in particular just a few short years later. Propping up black men as having status and saturating this “culture” with images of interracial couples, particularly white women with black men, sends an unmistakable message, handed down by cultural and financial elites, that there is a consensus approving of it. Women, as stated, are guided by consensus, far more so than their male counterparts.14 This is compounded by how, when race-mixing is mainstream and part of polite, acceptable society, it deters white men from speaking out against it, as it also makes it harder for white men to even perceive it as the evil it is.15
Addressing and Refuting the Continuum Fallacy as Rhetorical Tactic
Another tactic of obfuscation lodged by our ideological enemies is one that is a familiar one with most if not all matters touching upon race: instigating the continuum fallacy. In its most basic, essential form, this blithe assertion posits that, because there are some people who are more racially ambiguous, the very idea of race itself is a “social construct” and is to be dismissed outright. Such sleight of hand is particularly salient in regards to the misnomer of so-called Hispanics, a term that was, according to Richard Hanania, invented by the United States government. It runs the gamut from white Castilians and Portuguese, that is Europeans, to mestizos of the darkest hue.
One actress that typifies such obfuscation is Ana de Armas. Most if not all sources denote her as “Hispanic.” She was even used as an avatar for white dispossession in Knives Out, a cinematic abomination that sadly performed well at the box office and was nothing more than naked contempt for white people. Indeed, Jamie Lee Curtis stated as much, asserting that “white privilege gets a good comeuppance,” as if the depiction of white people as being insufferable trust fund babies is anything other than the most absurd caricature. The film concerns a wealthy mystery-novel writer, the patriarch of the Thrombley family, who suddenly dies at the end of the first act, creating intrigue both as to who killed him and the disposition of his estate. The film is a thinly veiled allegory of white dispossession, with the father disowning his rich spoiled family, and leaving everything to his Guatemalan maid. That “Guatemalan” maid, Marta Cabrera, is played by de Armas. Few if any Guatemalans look like de Armas. This is because de Armas is largely if not exclusively of European descent, despite her label as Hispanic. Her maternal grandparents migrated from Spain after Franco prevailed in the Spanish War. This author could not locate any information about her paternal grandparents, but her coloring and physiognomy are strikingly European.
A particularly titillating image of Ana de Armas. The accusation this image was selected because it may entice readers with a salacious thought, or several, is nigh impossible to deny. But it also displays her intrinsically European features, thus illustrating de Armas as part of a racial and ethnic continuum that exists among racially compatible phenotypes.
Some more zealous, firebrand sorts may object that de Armas is not “white.” that history of racial admixture in the Iberian Peninsula or for that matter southern Italy (Sicily in particular) render such persons “not white,” to say nothing of how little is known about her paternal grandparents. Such controversies are merely part of the continuum fallacy mentioned earlier. Various hues of red with tinges of orange may invite reasonable differences of opinion as to when and how such hues of red cease to be red and become orange, or orange red. But such quibbles, solche Kleinigkeiten, cannot fairly be used to advance the absurd proposition that red therefore does not exist, or that red is a social construct, or that because there are differences of opinion as to when red with hues of orange become “orange red” or even orange, that there is therefore no meaningful distinction between red and red orange on one hand and red and green on the other. As explicated in “The Inherent Right of Race, Blood, and Soil” such sophistry invoking this very continuum fallacy is used to advance The Great Replacement via mass third world immigration and to deconstruct the very notion of racial identity as it pertains to these weighty issues:
One example of such sophistry is equivocating the Norman Invasion—which happened almost a thousand years ago and consisted of hostile Norman invaders who nonetheless had some racial and geographic affinity and proximity to the Anglo-Saxons and others who populated the British Isles—and using that as a vehicle to suggest that millions of black, Muslim, and other migrants that have arrived by boat, plane, or other conveyance are really no different. The multiculti mousketeers also like to mention that there used to be a contingent of “Blackamoors” in London in the 16th Century, until Queen Elizabeth rightly expelled them.
It must be conceded if an infusion of millions of people with the de Armas phenotype were infused into Britain or Germany, certain phenotypes of these peoples might be altered to some degree. This invokes, in this author’s mind at least, a strange suggestion overheard many years ago; “while we are all vaguely aware that there are a billion Chinese on the planet [and now a billion Indians], humanity would have had to look for a different planet if there were a billion Germans.“ A dubious proposition given the state of affairs under American hegemony. But such a silly quip does invoke an important mental exercise. Consider an alternate set of circumstances where Germans were still fertile, with a birth-rate far in excess of the death rate, such that there were mass migrations of Germans, as there were to the United States in much of the 19th Century. Consider a scenario where millions of German migrants descended on Ireland, to the point where English is no longer heard in certain quarters of Dublin town, and many wait for the crosswalk signal to turn green, even with no incoming traffic for a couple hundred yards or more, this among many quirks that define the German national character. A much more benign invasion than the one Ireland and the rest of Europe is afflicted with, but one that would fundamentally change Ireland and Irish society in short order. Irish and Germans often look alike, but have somewhat different national characters. If a hypothetical infusion of millions of Germans would drastically and permanently alter Irish society, it follows that racially alien and incompatible peoples will necessarily transform Irish society and culture in far more drastic ways. Indeed, they will destroy Irish society in particular and all of Europe more generally.
This hypothetical demonstrates that while race-mixing is just the most immediate threat to cultural identity, different peoples must nonetheless regulate and temper, to some smaller degree, infusion of racially and culturally related peoples who share close geographical proximity and racial affinity. Such considerations are of course an indictment of experiments like the European Union, even if that body were not guilty of these criminal designs to infuse tens of millions of African and Middle Eastern migrants who have no right to set foot on the sacred continent of Europe. This hypothetical migration into Dublin town by Germans actually procreating brings to mind infusions of large numbers of Eastern Europeans in Britain and Scotland in particular, and how that infusion has upset the cultural and even ethnic equilibrium of the United Kingdom. It follows, a priori, that infusions of wholly alien and racially incongruous peoples will destroy that equilibrium much more quickly, even if in fewer numbers. This is precisely why the importation of wholly alien peoples and races must not be tolerated at all.
A Clear and Obvious Moral Imperative, Despite Nigh Impossible Odds
As is the case with so many other existential threats facing European peoples throughout the world, both on the sacred continent and in the new world, the nature of the problem is fairly clear. The solution to these problems is far more daunting. If cultural and institutional power were obtained by the populist right, along with the political capital and popular mandate to seize such power, is the best policy a more radical vision that will not countenance much more than a drop of miscegenant blood, or should limited numbers of miscegenated offspring, such as those of Yasser Seirawan be “grandfathered in,” but with a thus-far-and-no farther reformation of social mores as well as laws? Whatever the final disposition may ultimately be, there must be resolve that, going forward, the sons and daughters of Britain particularly and Europe generally must not be allowed to do as Margaret Elvin did.
However one answers these questions, the road ahead is perilous and discouraging, with odds for redemption approaching impossibility. In the United States, miscegenation has been discerned, somehow, as a “constitutional right,” since Loving v Virginia struck down anti-miscegenation laws some sixty years ago. Decades of neglect of culture by fuddy-duddy, mainstream conservatism, as well as widespread cowardice to grapple with matters of race with any fortitude or insight, has allowed nefarious and powerful interests to consolidate their hold on the culture. Over the decades, the cultural programming and indoctrination on these matters has only been more brazen. This implores the need for stringent censorship of depictions of interracial sex and relationships if and when the populist, ethno-nationalist right ever obtains political and cultural power. Rather than simply banning what some do not like, such censorship would be based on first principles.16
Some are apt to point out that white women are least apt to enter into interracial marriages, but marriages are not the same as sexual relationships or even just the sort of rampant promiscuity that defines so-called “hook-up” culture. Even five to ten percent adds up over the generations (between 20 and 40 percent will be lost in just four generations, and that is only if the supposedly low numbers hold steady, which they most certainly will not as miscegenation is promoted more and more aggressively). But as with these other existential threats that have brought European peoples to the precipice of oblivion, the solution to the problem begins with an understanding of that problem and the unwavering resolve that blossoms from clearly discerning these threats and their nature. Just as burning embers can be fanned into flames that ultimately grow into an all-consuming inferno, the seemingly impossible feats before us begin with a clear discernment of the nature of the problem at hand.
PLEASE NOTE: readers who enjoy this content are urged to consider offering a paid or founding member subscription. Readers who enjoy this essay are asked to press the “like emoji” to signify their favor and share with anyone who would find this insightful, interesting, or provocative.
Follow Richard Parker on twitter (or X if one prefers) under the handle (@)astheravencalls. Delete the parentheses, which were added to prevent interference with Substack’s own internal handle system.
PLEASE ALSO NOTE: readers of this essay are particularly encouraged to familiarize themselves with this publication’s somewhat more stringent comment policy. This pertains particularly to any multi-culti mousketeers and other detractors who are likely to find this. Any dissent expressed should be courteous and demonstrate the piece was actually read and understood. Vitriol, personal attacks, repeated arguments stating the same thing over and over will be dealt with in an appropriate manner. Duly consider that it takes far less time to delete and block than it does to type any unhinged screed necessitating such a response.
Readers may be excited to learn this will be the subject of a shorter, ancillary essay: “Living in the 80s: A Brief Reactionary Retrospective on 80s Music and the 80s Music Video.”
For those unaware, this Disney rehash proffered an origin story of the villainess from 101 Dalmations, Cruella de Vil. It is difficult to summon words in the English language sufficient to condemn this utter garbage with the scorn and contempt this abomination so richly deserves. The constant needle drops, including of numbers not even from the era in which the film was set, was by itself an absolute affront, this among many other things. Lest there be any confusion, the source material of the original hardly suffices as high art of even good cinema, but it has proven popular among successive generations. Many, including this author, doubtlessly remember watching this and other Disney animations as a child. It is for this reason that race-swapping Anita Radcliffe and other characters matter, and matter a great deal, even if these cultural expressions hardly rise to the level of Hamlet or even Breaking Bad. As explained in relation to other instances of shit culture, this author was obliged to see the film for the purposes of “resistant viewing.” No monetary contribution was made in this effort.
It is of note that race as avatar of culture, civilization, and identity is reminiscent of how certain animals are emblematic of a people, race, and civilization. Consider how the Raven is emblematic of Norse culture, as well as its role in the Anglo-British tradition.
As an aside, this author does not share the enthusiasm for this young woman expressed by many. Her manner of speech suffers from vocal fry, a most grating and insufferable mannerism. Beyond that, I have been informed that she, too, has been featured in depictions of race-mixing, the very thing this essay denounces. Finally, that American Eagle attire looks cheap, like something a person would have bought at K-Mart.
One question of interest, that is beyond the scope of this essay and this author’s expertise, is the degree to which mixed race offspring suffer from increased medical problems derived solely from their physiology. Increased likelihood of drug addiction, homelessness, any number of social problems can always be explained by the sordid band of multi-culti mousketeers as caused by racism and intolerance. There does seem to be chatter indicating mongrels derived from black and white miscegenation in particular suffer from even greater difficulty in obtaining bone marrow transplants. I also seem to recall murmurings about difficulties in obtaining organ transplants. Even if these and other phenomena were proven false, the resolution against race-mixing must be resolute and unwavering, because the real evil is threat it poses to European identity and our posterity.
It will be discretely stipulated that, perhaps in certain circumstances warranting personal justice, murder may not be so wrong if only one could get away with it. Consider a grown adult who exacts vengeance against an abusive step-parent. Or a man whose best friend seduces his own wife.
Yes, dear readers, this author grudgingly watched the first season. Rest assured it was in the spirit of “resistant viewing,” in order to understand and know the enemy better. No monetary contribution was made in this effort.
This has not required any such bit of resistant viewing. One can know what a dish of monkey brains is and that it is not palatable without partaking in such fare. Second-hand accounts more than suffice, just as reviews and analysis, particularly from YouTube personality Critical Drinker, inform viewers as to how awful the second season of The Last of Us was.
Readers familiar with this author’s work will also be familiar with this critically important concept that remains little understood by far too many. Defining deviancy down is closely related with the Durkheim Constant, which posits that any society, no matter how virtuous or profligate, will have the same quotient of what that society regards as deviant, even as each society has vastly different moral standards and mores. As a result, if deviant behavior is not properly sanctioned and deterred, society slowly loses its ability to regard such behavior as deviant, and that formerly deviant behavior then becomes mainstream. More outlandish, extreme behavior then moves up on the periphery of social behavior that is deviant, but not inconceivable. A crucial phenomenon associated with this process is that as society defines deviancy ever further downward, eventually what was once mainstream and uncontroversial becomes deviant. This is because any society and civilization must have some behavior it regards as deviant, to fill the quotient of deviant behavior envisaged by the Durkheim Constant. This is seen today insofar as opposition to interracial sex and relationships, even opposition to so-called gay marriage is now deemed as socially and morally unacceptable in much of mainstream society today. In addition to other essays discussing this vital concept, see Slouching Towards Gomorrah by Robert Bork, most particularly the introduction.
See most particularly “Thrust Into It All: The Individual Defined by Culture and Circumstance.” Also see “On the Indoctrination of Frau Löwenherz: A Case Study of Culture as Programming.” Finally, Culture and the Sexual Marketplace” is also highly relevant. These essays have been hyperlinked in the body of the work, but in case readers missed them, this footnote serves to direct them to these works.
Readers with a morbid curiosity or who prefer not to flinch from the ugliness and degeneration of the modern age may be interested in perusing this link, featuring “Queen of Spades” related attire and other accoutrements available on Etsy. Not for the faint of heart, reader discretion is advised: https://www.etsy.com/market/queen_spade_clothing?ref=pagination
Alas, after more than brief perusal of his catalog on oydsee.com, I am unable to locate the video in which this occurred. Any readers who can be of assistance are encouraged to provide these details, either in the comments or private correspondence.
This important event is discussed in detail in both “The Inherent Right of Race, Blood, and Soil” as well as “Neither Inherent nor Self-Evident: Reflections on the Chimera of Human Rights.”
Another related development concerns reports and private correspondence documenting how women are “virtue signaling” leftist platitudes not just on dating profiles, but even hook-up sites of more dubious repute. These include admonitions such as “No Trump supporters,” “No MAGA,” “Do not contact me if you do did not vote for Kamala (or Biden before her). Other instances concern overt and seemingly out of place statements expressing solidarity for LGBTQ-Yuck. To be sure, many of these women would swoon after a certain sort of right wing male impales her so much like a pin through a butterfly, and even more so if he confides right-wing leanings after the deed is done. These considerations notwithstanding, readers currently single and “on the hunt” are strongly advised to feign acquiescence until things are consummated.
Readers should be reminded that women are the gate-keepers of sexual access. Men are somewhat less susceptible to groupthink, social proof and pre-selection, and the like, but are still subject to phenomena such as peer pressure, social contagion, and so on. Far more critically, men will tailor their strategy in the sexual marketplace according to what desirable women want. The extent to which men will go to gain favor of the most desirable women cannot be overstated. This ranges from fisticuffs to life threatening behavior, to adopting the most obnoxious manner of dress and listening to the very worst music because that is what “hot chicks” favor.
The call for outright censorship may shock those readers of a more mainstream persuasion. But if there is a consensus supporting censorship of tobacco products in the name of public health, censorship promoting miscegenation is surely just as tenable, if not more so, particularly if the right to common race, blood, and soil is correctly discerned as, if not an inalienable right (because nothing is truly an inalienable right), then a right of first principle, something that is not negotiable.
Common objections include the assertion that censorship never works, citing for example the Streisand Effect. This objection is addressed in “American Degeneracy Laid Bare,” as well as “Pornography and the Failure of the Constitution,” noting that censorship works in Germany because it is backed by moral consensus and because they are not so stupid as to sensationalize what they censor. Finally, the case United States vs Phillips further informs this author’s increasing aversion to so-called “First Amendment Principles.” Citing legal doctrines of vagueness and the chilling effect, the Supreme Court struck down a law criminalizing the production and sale of dog-fighting videos, even though dog-fighting is illegal in all 50 states. As explicated in “Pornography and the Failure of the Constitution,” the law was revised, limiting its scope to so-called sexual crush videos. Consider the assertion that any material, even written word material, espousing the supposed “advantages” of torturing and killing cats, either gratuitously or out of perverse sadism of the lowest sort, has no redeeming value whatsoever and should just not be tolerated. And, if power is ever seized and consolidated, such intolerance should be punctuated by strong-arm, jackboot, and other more lethal instruments, utilized by the state in a new, anti-democratic form of government capable of forging a new order properly envisaging the salvation and revitalization of European civilization and culture, and her peoples.
Obviously, at least some materials promoting miscegenation do fit under the paradigm of “the exposition of ideas” articulated in Chaplinsky vs New Hampshire. There are, or rather should be, distinctions between commercial advertising and speech uttered by private individuals. Whereas I articulated, I believe persuasively, that the First Amendment ought not be interpreted and administered so as to create a constitutional right to produce, sell. and consume pornography, I am unable to argue that the First Amendment was never intended or envisaged to allow for materials promoting miscegenation, at least as they pertain to more cognitive expressions that articulate and advocate for such ideas in an intelligible, coherent way. A case can be made to exempt what is decried as vulgar, emotive, expression as well as what is obviously and blatantly commercial speech, advertising most particularly. Were it possible, however, any contemplated ban and censoring of speech advocating race mixing should also extend to more cerebral types of speech that facilitate the “exposition of ideas,” the hallmark of “high value” speech that receives the most robust protections under the First Amendment. This just bolsters my position that both the Constitution and the democratic form government more generally must be jettisoned, if and when the means to do so are made reasonably available.
I suppose I have been very lucky,I have known my wife since birth our fathers were best friends,she is not a feminist and was taught to date her own people we have 3 adult children all are following the right path ,my wife is an Asatruar and a paragon of the nine noble virtues ,we need women like her , Good article thnx for the link
Magnum opus